Home Vertu Phones You are here Updated : Apr 22, 2015, 2:48 AM Vertu Ascent Specs Battery 780 mAh Description I want it 0 users I have it 0 users I had it 0 users Popular Comparisons The Vertu Ascent is most commonly compared with these phones: Vertu Ascent vs Samsung Galaxy S24 Vertu Ascent vs Samsung Galaxy S23 Vertu Ascent vs Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra Vertu Ascent vs Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra Vertu Ascent vs Samsung Galaxy S22 Specs Compare Hardware Device type: Basic phone Battery Capacity: 780 mAh Type: Li - Ion, User replaceable Camera Rear: Single camera Design Size comparison Dimensions: 4.25 x 1.73 x 0.87 inches (108 x 44 x 22 mm) Weight: 6.10 oz (173.0 g) Features: Soft keys Connectivity & Features Bluetooth: EDR Phone features Notifications: Polyphonic ringtones, Vibration, Phone profiles Other features: Voice dialing Despite our efforts to provide full and correct Vertu Ascent specifications, there is always a possibility of admitting a mistake. If you see any wrong or incomplete data, please LET US KNOW. If you are interested in using our specs commercially, check out our Phone specs database licensing page. Latest News This future smart ring might adjust itself until it gets the perfect reading Verizon’s new My Biz Plan offers maximum flexibility, valuable add-ons Best laptop deals this week: Save up to 73% on a new laptop with these hot offers Google Pixel 9a first impressions: flat on its back but not flat on value Walmart launches yet another JBL Flip 6 promo you don't want miss The Oppo Find X8 Ultra is official now: another déjà vu, but with a clever twist here and there Popular stories T-Mobile leaves many no choice but to consider another provider with its latest decision You may need to delete Google Messages and download from unofficial source for RCS to work I just ditched my grandfathered T-Mobile Magenta plan — and I’m not sorry T-Mobile is raising prices yet again with the oldest and dirtiest trick in the book T-Mobile's free line offer is giving some customers a very expensive surprise Pixel's latest update could mean we're the problem, not Google